Insight by Psychology
Authentic influencer endorsements inform because they reflect real experience and align with users' needs, while counterfeit endorsements (fake scarcity or cherry-picked claims) exploit heuristics and erode trust.
Every card on Korva is an insight someone saved from a podcast or video they loved.
More from @psychology's Picks
See all →Presenting multiple credible authorities strengthens persuasion because several endorsements signal consensus and avoid the appearance of cherry-picking, which reinforces the message's credibility.
Successful people often believe the world is meritocratic because survivor bias leads them to observe only those who worked hard and succeeded, causing them to generalize that effort reliably produces success while ignoring failed but hardworking peers.
Using precise numbers boosts persuasion because specific figures look evidence-based, and slightly imperfect, non-round numbers (e.g., 89% vs 90%) feel less manufactured and therefore more believable.
Your capacity for wholeheartedness is limited by how much heartbreak you're willing to endure, because wholehearted engagement requires vulnerability that exposes you to loss and pain.
Slightly increasing your speaking cadence makes you seem more confident and convincing because speaking a bit faster signals familiarity and conviction, which listeners interpret as confidence and truthfulness.
World-record performances often need favorable external conditions because transient boosts like tailwinds add performance margin that, combined with top-level ability, enable records that ability alone might not reach.
When people are uncertain they look to perceived authorities rather than introspection because internal confusion undermines reliable self-judgment, so deferring to experienced voices reduces uncertainty.
Attributing positive outcomes to your own traits reduces willingness to share rewards because internal explanations create feelings of entitlement that decrease perceived obligation to redistribute gains.